Healing Stone - Book review

Review of Healing Stone by Brock Booher

First, a disclaimer that I know the author, Brock.  Does that sway my opinion of this book?  Maybe.  I purchased the book because I like him and wish him success as a writer.  He is, however, a good story teller.  Better than I would have guessed actually,   I have a stack of books on the table next to my bed but curiosity forced Healing Stone to the top.  As I completed my other book and dropped it to the floor I wondered if this one would be worth reading.  Brock convinced someone to publish his book but could he really pull off a good story?  Yep.  First chapter was good, the accident with the dog is shocking to read, bad enough to waken Stone's healing powers.  But they are healing powers that he can't control and that only cause more problems.  Stone's parents are sincere and loving, each wanting what is best for both of their boys.  All the characters feel like they are well established, with writing clues helping me think I had known them for more than a few hundred pages.  Although I knew the book was set in the fifties I hadn't expected the stark depictions of poor blacks and some white people's treatment of them.  I would say this book is aimed at teenage readers but there is nothing in it annoying to adults.  There are great touches that share Stone's experience of being distracted by pretty girls and driving too fast along with chores on the farm and ice cream with friends.  There are frequent references to good music.  All the elements combine well to create a believable atmosphere in which a 17 year old boy tries to figure out how and why he can heal people.  

 

Republicans I won't vote for

I am creating a list of Republicans that I won't for.

1)  First in the news - Jeb Bush.  Never going to happen.   Because I don't want another Bush in the list of American presidents.

I agree with his mother.  Wise woman.  No more Kennedys, Clintons or Bushes.  There are other families.

2)

Lessons from Noah

Lessons from the story of Noah:
God has a plan for his children
He loves his children
He will not allow the wicked to prevail
He will save the righteous. 
He is serious about his children keeping the commandments. 

First, let's review the story of Noah because it is not universally known in an age of biblical ignorance.  Noah is a prophet of God and the son of a prophet. His job is to teach people God's word.  But not many are listening. The world is full of violence. Noah tries to get everyone to repent.  We don't know how many lives he changes but overall the project is a failure.  The time has come for serious action. God instructs Noah to build an ark because He is going to flood the earth. The ark is built, food and animals are gathered and the rain begins.  Apparently this is the first time it rains on the earth. And so it rains big.  40 days and nights nonstop. Every person and animal dies. Except for the eight people on the boat and the animals in there. It takes another 150 days for the water to subside. They stay on the ark a little longer and send out birds.  One time a dove returns with a leaf. Next flight it doesn't return and we can only guess it has found a better home than the ark. They stay on the arc for a while, I guess to let some of the mud dry out. Then they all disembark and repopulate the earth. God covenants with Noah never to destroy the earth by water again and leaves a rainbow in the clouds as a sign. Noah's sons continue down to Abraham. 

The flood is the first recorded destruction in the Scriptures but not the last. Another famous one is Sodom and Gomorrah.   In that episode Abraham argued that the city be spared on account of the righteous that dwelt there. Unfortunately, there were not many. Instead Lot and family were extracted and the cities were wiped out. 

Again we see that God will spare those that follow his instructions. (Just don't look back.)  And we can't fail to notice the seriousness of obedience to the commandments of God.  If you are evil then you risk heavenly destruction. 

But why and how does that prove God's love?  All evil is not destroyed by God, or else we wouldn't have such obvious problems with evil people.  Kim Jong Un should have met a meteor by now if instant punishment was the rule. 

There comes a time when a civilization is so bad that good people can't change it or get a fair chance at exercising free will because there is only evil before them continuously. When that happens it is the love of God for children that mandates a reset. 

Suitable education

I read an opinion by the Arizona School Administrators that was shared on AZcentral.com.  They included this quote from Thomas Jefferson.  "An enlightened citizenry is indispensable for the proper functioning of a republic. Self-government is not possible unless the citizens are educated sufficiently to enable them to exercise oversight. It is therefore imperative that the nation see to it that a suitable education be provided for all its citizens."

Here is my response:

If Thomas Jefferson were leading the country today, he would have many concerns.  If we put aside the obvious disasters (which is everything the progressives are doing) he might note that there are problems with education.  I won’t pretend to guess his thoughts or actions but I will agree that he was in favor of education for all.  President Jefferson might even “vocalize a call to action for the future of American public education”, whatever that means.  

Of course, how and what to teach is debatable.  I have no problem with public education.  I have a problem with government schools.  I don’t like what they teach or how they do it.  That is the cause of the blatant lack of support for public education. If you want to invoke the founding fathers, then you should ask yourself what someone like Jefferson would view as the goal of education.  What does it mean to have an “enlightened citizenry”? One that is indispensable for the proper functioning of a republic?  It does not mean students that fill in bubbles on a standardized test.  It does not mean students who know how to recycle.  The government schools are a waste of time (and a ton of money) because they do not teach what they should.  

What program does your school have that is teaching everyone, not just students, to be self-governing?  The goal of government schools is to create obedient, left-leaning citizens. Workers for the machine of government.  I am interested in a true liberal education, that frees the mind and harnesses the passions.  Instead, schools these days are all about self - expression.  

Thomas Jefferson didn’t go to a public school.  He was taught the wisdom of the ancients.  He didn’t invent any of the ideas that he wrote in the Declaration of Independence.  These were principles that were taught to him by his tutors.  He read and studied and then expressed self evident truths to the world.  However, these are not principles that children study today.  They watch Al Gore movies and cut French words out of magazines.  They sit stoned in class, and the teachers don’t care.  Keeps them quiet.  

How about we teach our children what Thomas Jefferson learned?  Because that is the public education that our children should receive. We need to prepare them to be leaders in our republic.  They can learn to answer questions like: What is justice?  What is the highest good?  Those are questions they should be asking.  Instead we get Common Core.  America’s greatness did not come from beating other nations in math scores, it is based on better principles.  Most of these principles cannot be taught anymore because it would resemble religion, which is now a forbidden subject in school.  The Bible was a part of Thomas Jefferson’s education.

Meanwhile, this silly group called the Arizona School Administrators claims that shared tax money will “undermine the fabric of our democracy”.  Isn’t that a little hysterical?  These bureaucratic types will never have enough money.  There is a current reform proposal in Arizona to allow for voucher-like payments of tax money to schools of the parent’s choice, and that would include private schools.  Perhaps even schools run by a church, heaven forbid.  School Administrators are freaking out.  As if someone is trying to get a piece of their pie.  They own it, right?  They believe that all school money rightfully belongs to government educators.  I wish they could learn how to budget that pie and then maybe stop the constant requests for donations of paper for the local high school.  Money for public education comes from taxes.  From We the People.  It is my money and should be spent how I see fit.  There should be no rule that tax money never be spent on anything but government schools.  We need school choice and less money taken from us to be wasted on poor education.   

This school administrators group wants to use Thomas Jefferson’s quote as a call for support of public education.  I don’t think they understand what he was asking for.  Providing a suitable education does not mean more control, more money and a government monopoly.  They don’t get it. Read the Jefferson quote again.  I think it convicts them as failures to accomplish what he was asking for.  

Solar Power

We seem to have skipped winter here in Arizona.  I think the rest of the country must have stolen all the cold and left us with the heat.  Seems like a poor bargain as we have too much warmth already.  And they don’t seem content with their frozen loot.  It is time to prepare to switch the air conditioning back on.  No one likes doing it because it means that summer has begun, no matter what the calendar says.  And it means huge electric bills.  Whenever there is a problem as painful as paying for air conditioning, someone clever will find a way to make money off of a solution.  It is the marvelous result of having an economy driven by entrepreneurs, for which we need a new non-French word.  However, we need to make sure we are solving the correct problem.   Hint: it is not the cost of electricity. 

One of the proposed solutions that I have seen around lately is rooftop solar.  Why not use the light from the sun to reduce the heat of the sun?  Sounds very clever.  I don’t know why I don’t see that as a catch phrase on the solar company’s websites.  But does it actually do any good?  Does it reduce the huge summer electric bill?  Actually it can in a way, but it can create other problems.   

First, it is ugly.  I am a huge Star Wars fan but I don’t know why anyone wants their house to look like a TIE-fighter.  Second, it is a legal hassle.  You don’t own the solar panels, they are leased to you from a solar company.  You buy the electricity from the panels they own on your roof.  You have to claim the solar credits from the IRS on your taxes.  Their recent success has proven that the solar companies have made this whole process as painless as possible.   Congrats to them on that point.  Third is efficiency – it is impossible for a solar panel to produce very much electricity and it is far less efficient than burning fuel at the power plant.  I guess that is two things but they are related.  You need a lot of solar panels because they really don’t do much.  You need to cover a large portion of your roof just to run TV, lights, computer, refrigerator and the washer.  Forget the AC unit. Although I find it very cool that photovoltaic cells turn sunlight into electricity, solar panels can only produce a little power.  Not that they are lazy but simply that there isn’t much energy to extract.  Think about your last sunburn.  That is the energy of the sun, in all its wrath, on your unprotected skin.  Painful, but luckily, not instantly fatal, as if we were vampires.   The earth is just the right distance from the sun.  Good news for us, but bad news for solar panels.  There is a limited amount of energy for them to pick up.   And only when they are new because they wear out. Only when there are no clouds because they block all the energy (not a problem in AZ).  Only when they are clean because dust reduces their power.  Only during the day because I was just checking if you are still awake.  Only when the sun is facing the panels because even a few degrees off will show a drop in power production.  Only in the first seven years before the cells begin to degrade and only within 20 years before they are useless.   Solar panels are great to maybe recharge your cell phone when camping but not to run an AC unit.  The truth is that your local power plant is much better at this than you are.  

Why do homeowners want to get into the energy generation business?  To reduce the bill, yes I remember.  Can you really save money on this tortuous route?   Maybe but did you know that photovoltaic cells are made from plastic that, like all plastic, comes from oil?  Did you know that are made of metal that has to be mined?  Just checking in case you thought these panels saved the environment.  Did you know they are hard to make?  They will not eliminate your carbon footprint guilt.  The companies that make them are not solar powered because it takes about two years for a solar panel to produce enough energy to balance out the electricity that was required to build it.  That is why they are expensive.  Which brings me to the next point.  Why are all the solar companies installing these systems for free?   These cells aren’t cheap.  They aren’t efficient.  They are only moderately “green”.  Why is there someone in the lobby of Home Depot ready to sign me up to give me a free product?  Is he that devoted to my electric bill?  The truth is that these systems are not free.  Should a buyer be skeptical? 

The solar companies have learned the lesson of security systems and cell phones.  Give away the hardware and make money on the monthly service charge.  A proven business model.  But better yet, the solar companies have an edge.  They have politics on their side.  The religion of environmentalism is shared by most people who want to run government.  Current rules give tax advantages to ugly and inefficient ways to produce energy, aka green energy.  Because they value reduced carbon dioxide over the free market, they are willing to use the force of government to collect tax money from citizens and give it to other citizen who make “greener” choices.  I could say more about the government picking winners in the marketplace but that is another topic.  In relation to solar power I just want to point out that tax credits favor solar power and make the option more presentable in terms of money.  If the collective pays for my solar panels then I would win financially because the cost is spread over the community.  But what if everyone had solar panels?  Then we all lose money because there is no tax advantage if everyone is taking from and paying into the same pot of money.  Like a lottery where everyone wins every time.  The energy produced by solar costs more than that electricity I can buy from the power plant plus I would have to pay the manufacturers and installers.  That would mean that my monthly electric bill would have to increase.  If solar panels were the answer then why not buy them outright and forget the middleman with his leases and tax breaks?  

We must address the correct problem.  Let’s work to make electricity cheaper.  Using socialism only makes problems worse.  It only makes sense to buy solar panels to reduce my electric bill if I am willing to make my neighbors pay for it.  Current laws and taxes have made that legal but it is still immoral.  This form of socialism was given a name by Frederic Bastiat in 1830.  It is called legal plunder.  His writings on the subject in his book, The Law, are brilliant. He was French so I guess they aren’t all bad.  Solar panels might lower your electric bill but it just isn’t worth it.

DDT does not kill bald eagles

DDT does not kill bald eagles.  It does not thin their egg shells.  It is a lie.  Anyone who tells you that is either misled or a liar.